The field

The four programs divide along two axes that matter to us: whether the question is chiefly about a system’s conduct or about the environment it creates, and whether the human at the centre of it is being supported or taxed by what exists today.

They overlap, and the overlaps are where most of the interesting work has been.

The four programs placed against two axes Two axes divide the field. The horizontal axis runs from questions about a system's conduct to questions about the environment it creates. The vertical axis runs from a human currently supported by what exists to one currently taxed by it. Companionable Intelligence sits in conduct and supported; Learning as Experience in environment and supported; Neurodivergent-First Design in conduct and taxed; Sensory and Ambient Wellbeing in environment and taxed. All four regions overlap at the centre. CONDUCT OF THE SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT IT CREATES SUPPORTED TAXED Companionable Intelligence Neurodivergent- First Design Learning as Experience Sensory & Ambient Wellbeing THE HUMAN One house, because the overlaps are where most of the work has been.
Figure 1 The programs placed against the two axes that separate them. Where they overlap, a finding in one is usually a finding in the other, which is why they are run by one house rather than four.

How they are run

Programs are long. We publish when there is something true to say.

Every program uses the same method: study at family scale, research by building, and publish only what clears the bar. Most of what a program produces stays inside the house, which is the intended behaviour rather than a backlog.

If you are a researcher, an institution, or an aligned collaborator with a serious interest in any of these questions, we read correspondence carefully.

Correspondence The method →